Filed: May 13, 1999
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 175 F.3d 761 Panchita HODGERS-DURGIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Antonio V. Lopez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gustavo DE LA VINA, in his official capacity; Ronald E. Sanders, in his official capacity; Stephen Norman, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-16449. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 13, 1999. Before: HUG, Chief Judge.ORDER 1 Upon the vote of a majority of no
Summary: 175 F.3d 761 Panchita HODGERS-DURGIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Antonio V. Lopez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gustavo DE LA VINA, in his official capacity; Ronald E. Sanders, in his official capacity; Stephen Norman, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-16449. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 13, 1999. Before: HUG, Chief Judge.ORDER 1 Upon the vote of a majority of non..
More
175 F.3d 761
Panchita HODGERS-DURGIN, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated; Antonio V. Lopez,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Gustavo DE LA VINA, in his official capacity; Ronald E.
Sanders, in his official capacity; Stephen
Norman, in his official capacity,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 97-16449.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
May 13, 1999.
Before: HUG, Chief Judge.ORDER
1
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the enbanc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Hodgers-Durgin v. de la Vina, 165 F.3d 667, ----, slip op. at 193 (9th Cir.1999), is withdrawn.
